The influence of nasal deviation on the perception of maxillary dental centreline and smile aesthetics.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of nasal deviation on the perception of the maxillary dental centreline position as judged by orthodontists, dentists and laypersons. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, UK. PARTICIPANTS: Three groups of raters comprising 30 orthodontists, 30 dentists and 30 laypersons. METHODS: A frontal photograph of a smiling white woman was captured and digitally manipulated with varying degrees of nasal deviation and dental centreline (DC) position in increments of 1.5 mm and 3 mm to the right and left. Three rater groups assessed the attractiveness of images using a visual analogue scale (VAS). Multiple regression analysis was undertaken, and images were compared using the Tukey HSD method. RESULTS: Using a mixed linear model, the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was estimated in the range of 69%-86%, indicating good inter-rater reliability. The interaction between image rating and nasal position (P < 0.001), DC position (P < 0.001) and the relationship between nose and DC position (P < 0.001) were found to be statistically significant with symmetrical upper midline and nasal tip position, both considered to be most aesthetically pleasing. Image rating was not influenced by rater group type (P = 0.995), age (P = 0.983) or sex (P = 0.476). CONCLUSION: There was a preference for a central and coincident nose and maxillary DC position uniformly across the rater groups. Deviations of the nose, DC and their interactions negatively impacted on perceived smile aesthetics with increasing extent and opposing direction of deviations rated progressively more unaesthetic. No differences were observed between orthodontists, general dental practitioners and lay people with respect to perceived impact on smile aesthetics.

Royal London Space Planning as a learning tool for postgraduate Orthodontic students. A mixed methods study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of the Royal London Space Planning (RLSP) as a learning tool among postgraduate orthodontic students as well as investigate students' attitudes to its use. The RLSP tool is a structured method of orthodontic case assessment and treatment planning. DESIGN: A prospective cohort study of first year postgraduate orthodontic students who attended teaching of the RLSP. SETTING: Postgraduate teaching institute. PARTICIPANTS: First year postgraduate orthodontic students. METHODS: The outcome measured was the accuracy in assessment and planning of a standardised orthodontic simulated case before and after teaching. Qualitative assessment was conducted through focus group and a semi-structured format after the teaching. RESULTS: Nineteen students were included in the study. There was an overall improvement in assessment and planning of 20% after the teaching intervention (P < 0.05). Assessment improved by 34% in comparison to treatment planning, which improved by 17% (P < 0.05). The impact of the RLSP was most noticeable on the assessment of crowding in the lower arch which improved by 37% after teaching (P < 0.05). Students felt using the RLSP tool made them more confident and was advantageous to use in training; most felt they would not use the tool after qualification. CONCLUSION: The RLSP tool is an effective method of teaching assessment and treatment planning to postgraduate orthodontic students. The effect of the RLSP is greater at assessments and less significant for treatment planning. The participant students felt the RLSP improved their confidence in assessment and treatment planning.

A prospective cohort study evaluating subjective and objective neurosensory changes following LeFort I osteotomy.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to investigate the incidence and recovery of neurosensory deficit (NSD) after LeFort I osteotomy over 12 months and identify any association between age, gender, and extent of surgical movement on recovery. Furthermore, the study explored the relationship between objective and subjective outcome measures. METHODS: A prospective cohort study consisting of 31 patients. Subjects were assessed at baseline, 1 week (T1), 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months (T5) after LeFort I osteotomy. Objective assessment measures included pinprick (PP), static light touch (SLT), static 2-point discrimination (STPD), and electric pulp testing (EPT). Subjective reporting was undertaken using a visual analog scale. Patients rated the impact of NSD on intraoral and extraoral sites at the same time points as for objective measures. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients (16 females and 12 males) with a mean age of 24.5 years (standard deviation, 7.4) completed the study. There was a notable reduction in NSD from T1 (85.7%) to T5 (17.9%). No significant differences were found with respect to the influence of gender; PP (P = 0.06), SLT (P = 0.10), STPD (P = 0.65) and EPT (P = 0.19) or extent of surgical movement; PP (P = 0.50), SLT (P = 0.72), STPD (P = 0.06) and EPT (P = 0.74) on NSD. Age is a significant factor for intraoral NSD in the immediate postoperative period; PP (P < 0.0001) and SLT (P < 0.0001). Subjectively, patients reported a high degree of concern associated with NSD immediately after surgery with a gradual reduction from T1 to T5. There is a significant difference in subjective reporting between those with intraoral NSD than those with no intraoral NSD at 12 months (P = 0.031). CONCLUSIONS: NSD is high after LeFort I surgery, particularly intraorally in the palate. At 12 months, the incidence of NSD is 17.9%. Recovery of NSD to a nonsignificant value from baseline takes up to 3 months for extraoral sites and between 3 and 6 months for intraoral soft tissues. The maxillary dentition continues to recover from NSD up to 12 months postsurgery. Age, gender, and extent of the surgical movement do not influence the extent of NSD at 12 months. Increasing age is associated with increased NSD at intraoral sites immediately after surgery. Intraoral NSD is more of a concern to patients than extraoral NSD. Patients' concerns associated with NSD reduced over time, demonstrating a degree of adaptation in the longer term.

Establishing a clinical psychology team within the orthognathic service: A triad model of orthodontic, maxillofacial and psychological care.

The importance of psychological support for orthognathic patients has taken an increasing precedence over recent years and is embedded in orthognathic commissioning guidelines. Furthermore, attention towards mental health-related conditions and their management is of prime importance and continues to be a key area of focus within healthcare settings. With this in mind, this paper aims to outline our experience of establishing a need for and subsequently securing funding to establish a clinical psychology service within an existing orthognathic service in the NHS. The information outlined may be of benefit to orthognathic teams seeking to secure such psychological support within their respective units.

The stability of surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion (SARME): A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: This systematic review was conducted to determine the stability of surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion (SARME) for correction of transverse maxillary deficiency, the effect of distractor type (tooth-borne vs. bone-borne) and the influence of a retainer on post-expansion stability. METHODS: The review was conducted applying the PICO criteria. Electronic database searches of published literature (MEDLINE via PubMed), Ovid via MEDLINE, the Cochrane Oral Health Group's Trial Register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, (CENTRAL) and unpublished literature were accessed until January 2019. Search terms included SARME, 'stability', 'relapse', 'surgery', 'expansion' and 'maxillary expansion'. RESULTS: Five hundred and ten studies were identified overall and 15 studies were included (3 RCTs, 2 prospective & 10 retrospective) following initial screening and data extraction of full texts. The quality of evidence was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool for RCTs and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for prospective & retrospective studies. The heterogeneity of the retrieved articles prohibited quantitative analysis. Overall, the studies were either of high risk of bias or low quality. Qualitative analysis reveals SARPE to achieve expansion at the inter-canine region of 4-for inter 6 mm, inter-molar region of 6-8.9 mm, and skeletal level of 2.3-3.1 mm with relapse rates in the region of 0.1-2.3 mm (inter-canine), 0.2-3 mm (inter-molar) and 0-1.8 mm (skeletal) reported. CONCLUSION: Qualitative evaluation suggests SARPE results in significant expansion at the dental and skeletal level and that this appears to be stable. Existing literature is equivocal on the clinical benefits of a retention device or distractor type (bone-borne vs. tooth borne) on stability. This review has unearthed the need for high quality prospective RCTs to fully understand the stability of SARME, particularly with relation to varying distractor types and use of retention devices. As such, the inferences drawn should be considered with some discretion based on the quality of the available evidence.

Effectiveness of part-time vs full-time wear protocols of Twin-block appliance on dental and skeletal changes: A randomized controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this 2-arm parallel study was to compare the dentoalveolar and skeletal changes achieved with Twin-block appliance therapy prescribed on either a part- or full-time basis for 12 months. METHODS: Sixty-two 10- to 14-year-old patients were randomly allocated to either full-time (FT, 22 hours daily) or part-time (PT, 12 hours daily) wear of a modified Twin-block appliance. Participants were recruited from the Institute of Dentistry, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, United Kingdom, and recalled at 6- to 8-week intervals. Electronic randomization was undertaken, with group allocation concealed using opaque, sealed envelopes. The outcome assessor was blinded; however, it was not feasible to blind either operator or patients. Study models and cephalograms were taken at baseline and after 12 months of treatment. RESULTS: Data from 55 of the 62 participants were analyzed. Overjets were reduced by 7 mm (SD, 2.92) in the PT group and 6.5 mm (SD, 2.62) in the FT group, with no statistical difference between the groups (P = 0.587; 95% CI, -1.01, 1.78). Similarly, no clinical or statistical differences were noted for skeletal changes: ANB angle (PT, -1.51°; FT, -1.25°; P = 0.828; 95% CI, -0.68, 0.849), pogonion-sella vertical (PT, 3.25 mm; FT, 3.35 mm) or A-sella vertical (PT, 1.28 mm; FT, 1.06 mm). Mean wear durations were 8.78 hours a day in the PT group and 12.38 hours in the FT group. CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference in either dental or skeletal changes achieved with PT or FT wear of a Twin-block appliance over 12 months. Less onerous PT wear regimens may therefore be a viable alternative to FT wear of removable functional appliances. REGISTRATION: NCT02190630. PROTOCOL: The protocol was not published before trial commencement.

Understanding factors influencing compliance with removable functional appliances: A qualitative study.

INTRODUCTION: Lack of compliance during functional appliance therapy may lead to extended treatment or even induce treatment failure. The aims of this study were to explore factors influencing compliance in adolescents treated with a Twin-block appliance. METHODS: A qualitative study using one-to-one semistructured interviews involving a sample of adolescents undergoing Twin-block therapy with objectively recorded wear durations was undertaken. A topic guide was used to standardize data collection. Participants' views were tape recorded and field notes taken. Data were transcribed verbatim and analyzed with the use of framework methodology. RESULTS: A total of 22 participants were interviewed. Factors influencing compliance with removable functional appliance included: self-motivation, peer and authority influence, quality of life impairment and adaptability, perceived treatment progress, and pragmatic and recall issues. These factors were found to exert important roles as enablers, barriers, or both. Patient recommendations to improve compliance included effective communication, tailoring of prescribed wear duration, physical alteration of the appliance, and use of reminding tools. CONCLUSIONS: The study highlights the multifaceted perceptions of removable functional appliance wear, with compliance fluctuating over time and a range of factors influencing this. The potential for professional and parental influence as well as customized reminders to enhance compliance were also reported.

Ingestion of an orthodontic archwire resulting in a perforated bowel: A case report.

Accidentally, ingesting components of an orthodontic appliance can result in serious consequences for the patient. This paper presents one such complication, not previously reported, where the patient needed emergency surgery to retrieve part of an orthodontic appliance. This case report highlights the consequences of and possible solutions to prevent patients inhaling or ingesting parts of their appliance.

Incidence and impact of previous orthodontic treatment in patients attending orthognathic combined clinics: a survey.

This prospective questionnaire-based study was designed to determine the incidence of patients attending orthognathic combined clinics who have previously had orthodontic treatment, and to assess the impact, if any, this has had on their proposed surgical treatment. Contemporaneous and historical data from consecutive patients at different stages of treatment who were attending clinics at two London hospitals during a three-month period were included. In total 22/56 patients (39%) had previously had orthodontic treatment, and of those, it had had an undesirable effect on the current management of 10 (45%). The effects included a reduced range of dental movements available to orthodontists (8/23, 35%), undesirable extractions (5/23, 22%), and a prolonging of preoperative orthodontics (5/23, 22%). The median age at which previous orthodontic treatment had been started was 13.5 (range 11-26). Nearly a third of patients reported that they had not been advised by their referring practitioner that a combined orthodontic and surgical approach might be required. The study suggests that preliminary assessment should be improved. Patients should be informed about and prevented from undergoing orthodontic treatment that may limit future surgical management, otherwise they may have to face repeated and prolonged orthodontic treatment, unexpected operations, and potential limitations to the outcome of surgical treatment. This could be achieved through the training and education of all practitioners and the development of referral guidelines.

Level of knowledge and understanding of informed consent amongst the training grade group orthodontists in England, Wales and Northern Ireland.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the level of knowledge and understanding of informed consent in UK orthodontic trainees. DESIGN AND SETTING: A cross-sectional, written questionnaire-based study. SETTING: Hospital orthodontic departments in England, Wales and Northern Ireland. SUBJECTS AND METHOD: A one page questionnaire which covered a range of legal issues pertinent to informed consent was circulated to 207 members of the Training Grades Group (TGG) of the British Orthodontic Society (BOS). The questionnaire consisted of four open questions with 11 responses, which the investigators considered to be ideal, seven closed questions requiring yes/no responses and one question requiring a yes/no response followed by two open responses. Following the initial circulation, a second posting to non-responders was conducted. RESULTS: The response rate was 61% (N=126). The mean number of complete answers to the 21 questions was 13 (62%; median 13; mode 14). There were a low number of complete responses to specific questions in the following areas - explanations patients need from clinicians prior to obtaining consent; how to fully judge if a patient is capable of consenting; how to manage a patient incapable of giving consent; the legal status of fathers consenting on behalf of their children; whether consent forms have to be re-signed if the start of treatment is delayed by six months or more and responsibility for obtaining consent for dental treatment under general anaesthesia. CONCLUSIONS: There was a disappointingly high proportion of incomplete answers to questions testing the knowledge and understanding of the law as it pertains to informed consent exists amongst members of the TGG of BOS.

How to...mechanically erupt a palatal canine.

Management of ectopic permanent maxillary canines represents one of the greatest challenges to orthodontists. This paper outlines a variety of techniques and mechanics which may facilitate expedient, predictable and safe eruption of palatal canines. While each method may be useful in isolation, the varying presentations of palatal canines ensure that the ability to apply an array of techniques is essential if successful outcomes are to be consistently achieved.

Influence of supplemental written information on adolescent anxiety, motivation and compliance in early orthodontic treatment.

OBJECTIVES: To test the null hypotheses that supplementation of verbal information with written information when obtaining consent to orthodontic treatment has no effect on (1) anxiety, motivation and apprehension related to treatment and (2) compliance in the early stages of fixed appliance therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy-six adolescents who were due to start fixed appliance therapy were randomly allocated to receive verbal information only or verbal and written information before orthodontic treatment. Participants' anxiety, motivation, and apprehension were assessed using a questionnaire that was completed prior to meeting the orthodontic clinician (T1), following consent to treatment (T2), and after 12 weeks of treatment (T3). Appointment attendance, appliance breakages, and periodontal scores were used as measures of patient compliance. RESULTS: Sixty participants completed the study. At T2 there was no change in anxiety scores for either group (P = .412); however, increased motivation was detected in the group that had been given both written and verbal information (P = .049). At T3 both groups demonstrated similar reductions in anxiety (P = .311) and apprehension (P = .790) and similar levels of motivation (P = .756). A reduction in periodontal scores (P = .065), better appointment attendance (P = .732), and fewer breakages (P = .525) were reported in the group that was given additional information, although these changes were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Supplementation of verbal information with written information resulted in improved motivation for orthodontic treatment but had no statistically significant effect on anxiety, apprehension, or patient compliance.